4.6 Article

Comparison of diagnostic performances of different serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection in cats and dogs

Journal

TRANSBOUNDARY AND EMERGING DISEASES
Volume 69, Issue 6, Pages 3530-3539

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tbed.14716

Keywords

cats; diagnostic tests accuracy; dogs; immunological assay; serosurveillance; severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2

Funding

  1. Fondazione CARIPLO 2020 grant, project 'Genetic characterization of SARS-CoV2 and serological investigation in humans and pets to define cats and dogs' role in the COVID-19 pandemic (COVIDinPET)
  2. Ricerca Corrente IZSPB 01/20, project 'Valutazione della circolazione di SARS-CoV-2 e di altri coronavirus nel cane e nel gatto (CoronaPets)'
  3. ERA-NET Cofund on International Coordination of Research on Infectious Animal Diseases (ICRAD), project 'Multi-scale Eco-evolution of Coronaviruses: from surveillance towards emergence prediction (MUSECoV)'
  4. Universita degli Studi di Milano within the CRUI-CARE Agreement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Serosurveillance among animals, including pets, is crucial in the current COVID-19 pandemic as it helps in detecting SARS-CoV-2 infections that can establish new virus reservoirs. This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of three commercially available immunoassays for detecting SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in pets, highlighting the importance of assay validation.
Serosurveillance among animals, including pets, plays an important role in the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, because severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections in animal populations could result in the establishment of new virus reservoirs. Serological assays that offer the required sensitivity and specificity are essential. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of three different commercially available immunoassays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in pets, namely two ELISA tests for the detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid [ID Screen SARS CoV-2 double antigen multispecies (Double antigen) and ID Screen (R) SARS-CoV-2-N IgG indirect ELISA (Indirect)] and one test for the detection of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding-domain [surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT)]. The obtained results were compared with those of conventional virus neutralization test (VNT), which was regarded as reference method. A total of 191 serum samples were analysed. Thirteen (6.8%) samples showed VNT-positive results. The overall sensitivity was higher for sVNT (100%) compared to nucleocapsid-based ELISA assays (23% for Double antigen and 60% for Indirect). The specificity was 100% for Indirect ELISA and sVNT, when a higher cut-off (>30%) was used compared to the one previously defined by the manufacturer (>20%), whereas the other test showed lower value (99%). The sVNT test showed the highest accuracy and agreement with VNT, with a perfect agreement when the higher cut-off was applied. The agreement between each nucleocapsid-based ELISA test and VNT was 96% for Indirect and 94% for Double antigen. Our findings showed that some commercially available serological tests may lead to a high rate of false-negative results, highlighting the importance of assays validation for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in domestic animals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available