4.2 Review

The Role of Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields on Mesenchymal Stem Cells Differentiation: A Systematic Review

Journal

TISSUE ENGINEERING AND REGENERATIVE MEDICINE
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages 1147-1160

Publisher

KOREAN TISSUE ENGINEERING REGENERATIVE MEDICINE SOC
DOI: 10.1007/s13770-022-00473-1

Keywords

Mesenchymal stem cells; Differentiation; Low-frequency electromagnetic fields

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reviewed the scientific literature on the effects of low-frequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) on mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. The research found that EMFs can have positive effects on stem cell differentiation and accelerate the process. However, further study is needed to determine the specific parameters and application methods of the electrical field.
Background Low-frequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) influence biological processes. This present study was aimed at the scientific literature on the use of EMFs in the mesenchymal stem cell differentiation process. Materials and methods The electronic search was carried out in PubMed and Web of Science, a database with a combination of the sinusoidal and pulsed low- and extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields stimulation and mesenchymal stem cells differentiation, considering the period of publication until December 2021. The literature search identified 118 references in PubMed and Web of Science of which 46 articles were selected, respectively, according to the eligibility requirements. Conclusion The analysis of research indicated that EMFs are an easy-to-apply and practical way in cell therapy and tissue engineering when regulation of stem cells is required. Studies have shown that EMFs have positive effects on stem cell differentiation, accelerating its process regardless of the parameters and type of stem cells. However, the exact amplitude, frequency, duration of the electrical field, and application method remain elusive and need more study in future work.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available