4.7 Article

Phase field models of interface failure for bone application-evaluation of open-source implementations

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2022.103432

Keywords

Fracture; Crack propagation; FEA; Cement line; Osteon; Biomechanics

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council [2015-4795]
  2. Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (Stiftelsen Nordenskjoldska Swedenborgsfonden)
  3. Crafoord Foundation
  4. Foundation of Greta and Johan Kock

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a selection of recent open-source implementations of the phase field method was evaluated to find the best approach for simulating crack growth in bone tissue. A new method for correcting the interface fracture toughness in a phase field model was also proposed. The results showed that the quasi-Newton monolithic solvers outperformed the evaluated staggered solvers in terms of computational speed and robustness, and correcting the fracture toughness of the interface is crucial for simulating crack patterns.
Bone is a composite material where tubular osteon structures surrounded by thin interfaces reinforce the tissue at the microscale. These interfaces provide alternative weak paths for crack growth and give rise to potent extrinsic toughening mechanisms. Numerical models can help to gain a deeper understanding of fracture resistance in bone, however, capturing the interface mechanics is key. For this purpose, the phase field method for fracture is appealing due to its capability of capturing complex cracking phenomena. Still, it is far from well-established in the field of biomechanics. In this study, we evaluated a selection of recent open-source implementations of the phase field method to find the best approach for simulating crack growth in bone tissue. We also proposed a new method for correcting the interface fracture toughness in a phase field model. The selected implementations were compared using benchmark tests, including single edge notched tensile specimens with and without interfaces, as well as models representing typical bone geometries. We found the quasi-Newton monolithic solvers to be superior both in terms of computational speed and robustness compared to the evaluated staggered solvers. We also showed that correcting the fracture toughness of the interface is key for simulating crack patterns that are consistent with analytical predictions from linear elastic fracture mechanics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available