4.2 Article

Food abundance and weather modify reproduction of two arboreal squirrel species

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY
Volume 97, Issue 5, Pages 1376-1384

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jmammal/gyw096

Keywords

climate change; demographic responses; masting; resource pulse

Categories

Funding

  1. Oskar Oflunds stiftelse
  2. Societas Pro Fauna et Flora Fennica
  3. Vuokon Luonnonsuojelusaatio
  4. Academy of Finland [250709, 259562]
  5. Academy of Finland (AKA) [250709, 250709] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The importance of weather in relation to food resources, in determining reproduction, remains poorly understood for mammals, particularly for species that do not depend on food resources limited by spring weather conditions. We studied the effects that weather and food supply had on timing of spring reproduction and observed litter size in 2 squirrel species, the Siberian flying squirrel and the European red squirrel, using long-term data sets spanning 20-30 years. Both species subsist on foods from tree masting, and these are available for squirrels from autumn until early spring. Good food conditions in winter and spring before reproduction had positive effects on spring reproduction in both species by advancing the onset of reproduction, and in flying squirrels, slightly increasing litter size. Higher temperature in late winter and, surprisingly, increased precipitation in late winter resulted in early reproduction in flying squirrels and red squirrels, respectively. In addition, higher early spring temperature was positively related to litter size in red squirrels, likely reflecting low survival of small juveniles in cold weather. Our study supports the view that spring reproduction in these species is determined by food supply before breeding. Our results also highlight the fact that reproduction is also dependent on weather.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available