4.5 Article

Empirical measure large deviations for reinforced chains on finite spaces

Journal

SYSTEMS & CONTROL LETTERS
Volume 169, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2022.105379

Keywords

Large deviation principle; Reinforced random walks; Empirical measure; Time-reversal; Infinite horizon discounted cost; Stochastic approximation

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF), USA [DMS-1814894, DMS-1853968, DMS-2134107, DMS-2152577]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article investigates a reinforced chain and establishes a large deviation principle for it. The rate function, which is different from the traditional Donsker-Varadhan rate function associated with the empirical measure of the Markov chain, is described in terms of a novel discounted cost control problem involving the relative entropy function.
Let A be a transition probability kernel on a finite state space increment o = {1, ... , d} such that A(x, y) > 0 for all x, y is an element of increment o. Consider a reinforced chain given as a sequence {Xn, n is an element of N0} of increment o-valued random variables, defined recursively according to,1 Ln = n n- n-ary sumation i=0 1 delta Xi, P(Xn is an element of middot | X0, ... ,Xn-1)= LnA(middot).We establish a large deviation principle for {Ln, n is an element of N}. The rate function takes a strikingly different form than the Donsker-Varadhan rate function associated with the empirical measure of the Markov chain with transition kernel A and is described in terms of a novel deterministic infinite horizon discounted cost control problem with an associated linear controlled dynamics and a nonlinear running cost involving the relative entropy function. Proofs are based on an analysis of time-reversal of controlled dynamics in representations for log-transforms of exponential moments, and on weak convergence methods.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available