4.6 Article

Cost-utility advantage of interventional endoscopy

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09599-8

Keywords

Decision analysis; Esophagectomy; Hemicolectomy; Interventional endoscopy; Pancreatoduodenectomy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In choosing between interventional endoscopy and surgery, a comprehensive consideration of costs, utility values, adverse events, and long-term disability is necessary. Even if one strategy appears to be more effective in preventing death, the viability of alternative options should be considered.
Background Gastroenterologists frequently face the dilemma of how to choose among different management options. Aim To develop a tool of medical decision analysis that helps choosing between competing management options of interventional endoscopy and surgery. Methods Carcinoma-in-situ of the esophagus, large colonic polyps, and ampullary adenoma serve as three examples for disorders being managed by both techniques. A threshold analysis using a decision tree was modeled to compare the costs and utility values associated with managing the three examples. If the expected healing or success rate of interventional endoscopy exceeds a threshold calculated as the ratio of endoscopy costs over surgery costs, endoscopy becomes the preferred management option. A low threshold speaks in favor of endoscopic intervention as initial management strategy. Results If the decision in favor of surgery is focused exclusively on preventing death from a given disease, surgical intervention may seem to provide the best treatment option. However, interventional endoscopy becomes a viable alternative, if the comparison is based on a broader perspective that includes adverse events and long-term disability, as well as the healthcare costs of both procedures. For carcinoma-in-situ of the esophagus, the threshold for the expected success rate is 24% (range in the sensitivity analysis: 7-29%); for large colonic polyps it is 10% (5-12%), and for duodenal papillary adenoma it is 17% (5-21%). Conclusions Even if a management strategy surpasses its alternative with respect to one important outcome parameter, there is often still room for the lesser alternative to be considered as viable option. [GRAPHICS] .

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available