4.6 Article

Prospective cohort study on short-term outcomes of 3D-laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy with stented pancreaticogastrostomy

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Review Surgery

Learning curves in minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: a systematic review

Gayle Fung et al.

Summary: This study investigated the learning curve of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery and analyzed a large number of studies. The results showed that there were differences in the number of cases required to achieve author-declared competency for different types of minimally invasive surgeries, and operative times and blood loss improved with experience. However, there is currently no standardized evaluation for learning curves, and further work is needed to evaluate in a patient-centered manner.

LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY (2022)

Article Surgery

Perioperative and oncological outcomes following minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma

Rui Sun et al.

Summary: Through a meta-analysis, it was found that minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy provides similar or improved perioperative, short-term, and long-term oncological outcomes compared to open pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2021)

Article Surgery

Evidence-based evaluation of abdominal drainage in pancreatic surgery

J. Veziant et al.

Journal of Visceral Surgery (2021)

Review Surgery

Systematic review and updated network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic, and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy

Alberto Aiolfi et al.

Summary: A meta-analysis compared the short-term surgical and oncologic outcomes of Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy (OpenPD), Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy (LapPD), and Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy (RobPD). LapPD and RobPD showed similar outcomes to OpenPD in terms of mortality, postoperative pancreatic fistula, and severe complications, but had advantages in reduced hospital stay, blood loss, and overall complications. Minimally invasive techniques may improve outcomes for periampullary and pancreatic head neoplasms.

UPDATES IN SURGERY (2021)

Review Oncology

Prophylactic Intra-Peritoneal Drainage After Pancreatic Resection: An Updated Meta-Analysis

Xinxin Liu et al.

Summary: Prophylactic intra-peritoneal drainage after pancreatic surgery may benefit high-risk PD patients but may not provide clear benefits for DP patients. Drain placement in PD patients showed lower mortality but higher rates of CR-POPF, while in DP patients, it increased CR-POPF, wound infection, and readmission rates.

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY (2021)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial

Min Wang et al.

Summary: After the learning curve of LPD surgery, LPD performed by experienced surgeons is safe and effective. Compared to OPD, the postoperative length of stay is shorter for LPD patients, and the incidence rate of serious postoperative morbidities and mortality rates are similar.

LANCET GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY (2021)

Article Surgery

3D-laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy with superior mesenteric or portal vein resection for pancreatic cancer

Joachim Geers et al.

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2020)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Volume-outcome relationships in pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer

Lydia G. M. van der Geese et al.