Progestogens exhibit progestogen-, promoter- and isoform-specific effects via the progesterone receptor

Hormonal contraceptives (HCs) and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) are therapies designed to target the progesterone receptor (PR) to prevent unwanted pregnancy and to alleviate the symptoms of menopause, respectively, in women. Although these therapies are widely used globally, few studies have investigated in parallel how the transcriptional responses of the progestogens used in these therapies compare to each other via the PR isoforms (PR-A and PR-B). Using dose-response promoter-reporter and endogenous gene expression as-says, we compared the transcriptional responses of six widely-used progestogens via each PR isoform. The present study shows that progestogens exhibit progestogen-specific potencies and efficacies via both PR isoforms. In addition, the endogenous gene expression data reveals that progestogens exhibit promoter-specific effects. Furthermore, this study reveals that progestogen responses via PR-A are significantly more potent and less efficacious than those observed via PR-B, and that this is unlikely due to differences in PR protein levels. Cor-relation analysis revealed that there is no detectable correlation between potency or efficacy of progestogens for PR-B or PR-A versus reported relative binding affinity (RBA) of progestogens for the PR, consistent with complex mechanisms of PR regulation. Taken together, our data show that it cannot be assumed that all progestogens have similar transcriptional responses on all genes. Since the PR plays a role in cognition, regulation of inflammation, mitochondrial function, neurogenesis, female reproduction and disease, the data suggest that these important physiological functions could be differentially affected depending on progestogen, promoter, and ratios of PR isoforms.

Automated summary

This study compares the transcriptional responses of six widely-used progestogens via each progesterone receptor isoform. The results show that progestogens exhibit progestogen-specific potencies and efficacies through both PR isoforms. In addition, the study reveals that progestogen responses via PR-A are more potent and less efficacious than those via PR-B, independent of PR protein levels.