4.5 Article

Achieving fairness with a simple ridge penalty

Journal

STATISTICS AND COMPUTING
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11222-022-10143-w

Keywords

Linear regression; Logistic regression; Generalised linear models; Fairness; Ridge regression

Funding

  1. SUPSI -University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland
  2. UBS-IDSIA
  3. EPSRC
  4. MRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Statistical Science, University of Oxford [EP/L016710/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a general framework for estimating regression models with a user-defined level of fairness. Fairness is enforced through model selection, where a ridge penalty is chosen to control the impact of sensitive attributes. The proposed framework is mathematically simple and can be extended to various types of models and fairness definitions. Empirical evaluations show that the proposed framework outperforms other models in terms of goodness of fit and predictive accuracy at the same level of fairness.
In this paper, we present a general framework for estimating regression models subject to a user-defined level of fairness. We enforce fairness as a model selection step in which we choose the value of a ridge penalty to control the effect of sensitive attributes. We then estimate the parameters of the model conditional on the chosen penalty value. Our proposal is mathematically simple, with a solution that is partly in closed form and produces estimates of the regression coefficients that are intuitive to interpret as a function of the level of fairness. Furthermore, it is easily extended to generalised linear models, kernelised regression models and other penalties, and it can accommodate multiple definitions of fairness. We compare our approach with the regression model from Komiyama et al. (in: Proceedings of machine learning research. 35th international conference on machine learning (ICML), vol 80, pp 2737-2746, 2018), which implements a provably optimal linear regression model and with the fair models from Zafar et al. (J Mach Learn Res 20:1-42, 2019). We evaluate these approaches empirically on six different data sets, and we find that our proposal provides better goodness of fit and better predictive accuracy for the same level of fairness. In addition, we highlight a source of bias in the original experimental evaluation in Komiyama et al. (in: Proceedings of machine learning research. 35th international conference on machine learning (ICML), vol 80, pp 2737-2746, 2018).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available