4.8 Article

Enhanced electrochemical performance of ion-beam-treated 3D graphene aerogels for lithium ion batteries

Journal

CARBON
Volume 85, Issue -, Pages 269-278

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.12.097

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. LLNL [DE-AC52-07NA27344]
  2. Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) programs of LLNL [12-ERD-053, 15-ERD-022, 13-LW-099]
  3. UC Lab Fees Research Program [12-LR-235323]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High energy light-ion (3.8 MeV He) bombardment is used to introduce lattice defects in a 3dimensional (3D) interconnected network of graphene aerogels (GAs). When these materials are used as anodes for lithium ion batteries, we observe improved percentage reversible capacity and cycle stability compared to those without ion-beam treatment. Furthermore, all ion-beam treated 3D graphene samples exhibit substantially higher Coulombic efficiencies, suggesting at beneficial role of vacancy-type defects in stabilizing solid-electrolyte interphases. Although 3D graphene exhibits initial reversible capacities that are 2-3 times higher than that of graphite (similar to 372 mAh/g), fast capacity fading is observed but becomes more stable after ion-beam treatment. Our experimental results demonstrate that ionbeam treatment is an effective route to tune and produce good-performance graphene electrodes, and that vacancy-type defects help to promote reversible lithium storage capacity in graphene. We further observe that 3D GAs irradiated to the highest dose studied (1016 cm(-2)) fail rapidly upon electrochemical cycling, likely caused by the excessive ion-beam damage and graphene restacking. Raman I(D)/I(D') signature is considered linked to defect type in graphene and thus is proposed, for the first time, as an indicator of the reversible capacity for GAs, (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available