4.6 Article

A Single-Antenna Method and Post-Processing Strategy for Radar Cross-Section Measurements at Near-Field Ranges

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 22, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22197453

Keywords

single-antenna technique; radar cross-section; near-field; real environment; horn antenna

Funding

  1. Constanta Maritime University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a single-antenna technique for measuring the radar cross-section in a real environment. The technique corrects the near-field radar cross-section using an analytical factor calculated based on the far-field and near-field cross-sections. It takes into account the diffraction effects at the edges of the target for incidence angles higher than 20 degrees. The method also includes distance averaging and time-gating procedures to mitigate multipath propagation effects and isolate the reflection from the target.
The single-antenna technique proposed in this paper was developed for measuring the radar cross-section at near-field distances in a real environment, from reflection coefficient measurements on the antenna. The near-field radar cross-section is corrected with an analytical factor calculated as a ratio between the radar cross-section computed at far-field and near-field. The analytical correction factor takes into account the effects of the diffraction at the edges of the target at incidence angles higher than 20 degrees. An improved, distance averaging technique is proposed to reduce the multipath propagation effects. A time-gating procedure is additionally used in order to better isolate the reflection from the target and to remove the real environment contributions. The method was successfully tested on a rectangular metallic plate as a target over a wide frequency band, at normal and oblique incidence angles; however, it might also work for arbitrarily shaped targets, because they can actually be divided into small rectangular patches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available