4.6 Article

Development of Low Hysteresis, Linear Weft-Knitted Strain Sensors for Smart Textile Applications

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 22, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22197688

Keywords

smart textiles; knitted strain sensors; hysteresis-free sensors; conductive yarns

Funding

  1. Turkish Ministry of National Education

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the electromechanical performance of weft-knitted strain sensors and explores the effects of different variables on sensor performance. By positioning the conductive yarns at the inside of the sensing area, sensors with low hysteresis values can be obtained. The results show that by varying the knitting density, linear sensors with a working range up to 40% strain, hysteresis values as low as 0.03, and different GF values can be achieved.
In recent years, knitted strain sensors have been developed that aim to achieve reliable sensing and high wearability, but they are associated with difficulties due to high hysteresis and low gauge factor (GF) values. This study investigated the electromechanical performance of the weft-knitted strain sensors with a systematic approach to achieve reliable knitted sensors. For two elastic yarn types, six conductive yarns with different resistivities, the knitting density as well as the number of conductive courses were considered as variables in the study. We focused on the 1 x 1 rib structure and in the sensing areas co-knit the conductive and elastic yarns and observed that positioning the conductive yarns at the inside was crucial for obtaining sensors with low hysteresis values. We show that using this technique and varying the knitting density, linear sensors with a working range up to 40% with low hysteresis can be obtained. In addition, using this technique and varying the knitting density, linear sensors with a working range up to 40% strain, hysteresis values as low as 0.03, and GFs varying between 0 and 1.19 can be achieved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available