4.8 Article

Carbon quantum dots/SnO2-Co3O4 composite for highly efficient electrochemical water oxidation

Journal

CARBON
Volume 92, Issue -, Pages 64-73

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.03.002

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB825803, 2013CB932702]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51422207, 51132006, 21471106]
  4. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20123201110018]
  5. Suzhou Planning Project of Science and Technology [ZXG2012028]
  6. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanocomposites based on transition metal oxides (Co3O4, etc.) and carbon nanostructures with low-cost, high activity and good stability are promising catalysts toward electrochemical water oxidation, which is desirable but remains challenging. Here, we report the design and synthesis of nanocomposite based on carbon quantum dots (CQDs), SnO2 and CO3O4 (CQDs/SnO2-Co3O4) as the electrocatalyst for highly efficient oxygen evolution reaction (OER). In alkaline media, the complex exhibited high electrocatalytic activity and long-term stability, which was better than either pristine Co3O4 or SnO2-Co3O4 composite. Moreover, the CQDs/SnO2-Co3O4 with a molar ratio of Sn:Co at 1:3 revealed the highest catalytic activity toward OER among different molar ratios of CQDs/SnO2-Co3O4 composites. Experimental results indicated that the Co atoms were considered as the active centre, the nano-sized SnO2 enhanced electronic conductivity and the insoluble CQDs layer on the surface effectively protected the catalyst, thus the composite structure resulted in the excellent electrocatalytic activity and high stability. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available