4.6 Article

A Comprehensive Analysis of the Validity and Reliability of the Perception Neuron Studio for Upper-Body Motion Capture

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 22, Issue 18, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22186954

Keywords

inertial motion capture system; upper-body kinematics; biomechanics; validity; reliability

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2020YFF0304702]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the accuracy of the Perception Neuron Studio (PNS) in capturing upper-body motion and found that its kinematics data were highly consistent with a gold-standard optical system. The PNS provided accurate enough upper-body kinematics for further biomechanical performance analysis, making it a valuable tool in this field.
The Perception Neuron Studio (PNS) is a cost-effective and widely used inertial motion capture system. However, a comprehensive analysis of its upper-body motion capture accuracy is still lacking, before it is being applied to biomechanical research. Therefore, this study first evaluated the validity and reliability of this system in upper-body capturing and then quantified the system's accuracy for different task complexities and movement speeds. Seven participants performed simple (eight single-DOF upper-body movements) and complex tasks (lifting a 2.5 kg box over the shoulder) at fast and slow speeds with the PNS and OptiTrack (gold-standard optical system) collecting kinematics data simultaneously. Statistical metrics such as CMC, RMSE, Pearson's r, R-2, and Bland-Altman analysis were utilized to assess the similarity between the two systems. Test-retest reliability included intra- and intersession relations, which were assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) as well as CMC. All upper-body kinematics were highly consistent between the two systems, with CMC values 0.73-0.99, RMSE 1.9-12.5 degrees, Pearson's r 0.84-0.99, R-2 0.75-0.99, and Bland-Altman analysis demonstrating a bias of 0.2-27.8 degrees as well as all the points within 95% limits of agreement (LOA). The relative reliability of intra- and intersessions was good to excellent (i.e., ICC and CMC were 0.77-0.99 and 0.75-0.98, respectively). The paired t-test revealed that faster speeds resulted in greater bias, while more complex tasks led to lower consistencies. Our results showed that the PNS could provide accurate enough upper-body kinematics for further biomechanical performance analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available