4.5 Article

Coseismic Faulting Complexity of the 2019 Mw 5.7 Silivri Earthquake in the Central Marmara Seismic Gap, Offshore Istanbul

Journal

SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages 75-86

Publisher

SEISMOLOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1785/0220220111

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Turkish seismologists studied the 2019 Silivri earthquake to predict the future major earthquake in Istanbul, and found that this earthquake involved both strike-slip and thrust faulting. The simultaneous occurrence of these faulting types may have implications for tsunami hazard.
The submarine Main Marmara fault is overdue for an M > 7 earthquake in direct vicinity to the Istanbul megacity and the only segment of the right-lateral North Anatolian fault zone that has not been activated since 1766. On 26 September 2019, an Mw 5.7 earth-quake occurred offshore Silivri (west of Istanbul), stimulating the discussions on a future major earthquake. The predominant faulting style for this pending earthquake remains enigmatic. Here, we study the coseismic rupture evolution of the 2019 Silivri earthquake and decipher the multitype-faulting aspects by a nonstandard approach. The event was dominated by a large compensated linear vector dipole component, of about -50%, that we interpret as a consecutive strike-slip and thrust double-couple episode, closely collocated in space and time. Because of local variations of the fault geometry at the eastern boundary of the central basin, crustal shortening and related thrust faulting are expected. A striking observation is the almost synchronous occur-rence of both faulting types during a single earthquake. The earthquake complexity here is reported for the first time in the Sea of Marmara region and has to be considered in future rupture scenarios of an expected M > 7 event, with subsequent consequences for tsunami hazard and risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available