4.7 Editorial Material

Covid-19, and the climate change and biodiversity emergencies

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 844, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157188

Keywords

SARS-CoV2; Climate change; Biodiversity; Science -policy interface

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper discusses the possibility of learning lessons from studying the responses to COVID-19 and the human-induced climate change and loss of biodiversity emergencies. It emphasizes the importance of sound scientific knowledge, cooperation, evidence-based policies, public involvement, and political will in addressing these issues. The paper also highlights the need for enhanced interactions between science, economy, politics, and people.
This paper addresses the question, can lessons be learnt by studying the responses to COVID-19 and the human -induced climate change and loss of biodiversity emergencies? It is well recognized that to successfully address each of these issues requires sound scientific knowledge based on strong national and international research programs, cooperation between the research community and policy makers, national, regional and global evidence-based policies and coordinated actions, an informed and receptive public, and political will. A key question is how research and innovation can most effectively inform decision-making leading to cost-effective and socially acceptable action on pandemics, climate change and loss of biodiversity. This paper first describes how the COVID-19 pandemic has been addressed compared to the loss of biodiversity, and climate change, and then considers the use of scientific knowledge for policy-making and communication with the public. The paper then discusses human health and the natural environment as a global responsibility, and concludes on the need for an enhanced virtuous set of interactions between science, economy, politics and people.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available