Journal
JOURNAL OF MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS
Volume 402, Issue -, Pages 76-82Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.11.046
Keywords
Major hysteresis loop; Minor hysteresis loop; Remanent magnetization curves; Magnetic anisotropy; Exchange bias
Funding
- CNPq [307082/2012-1, 483277/2012-6, 407033/2013-0]
- CAPES [BEX 0298/2015-08]
- ICREA Funding Source: Custom
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Proper estimation of magnetization curve parameters is vital in studying magnetic systems. In the present article, criteria for discrimination non-saturated (minor) from saturated (major) hysteresis loops are proposed. These employ the analysis of (i) derivatives of both ascending and descending branches of the loop, (ii) remanent magnetization curves, and (iii) thermomagnetic curves. Computational simulations are used in order to demonstrate their validity. Examples illustrating the applicability of these criteria to well-known real systems, namely Fe3O4 and Ni fine particles, are provided. We demonstrate that the anisotropy-field value estimated from a visual examination of an only apparently major hysteresis loop could be more than two times lower than the real one. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available