4.7 Article

Removal of antibiotic microbial resistance by micro- and ultrafiltration of secondary wastewater effluents at pilot scale

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 838, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156052

Keywords

Microfiltration; Ultrafiltration; Standard filtration mode; Antibiotic resistance genes; 16S rRNA gene, total cell counts

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [02WRS137J]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the removal of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) in wastewater using low-pressure membrane filtration. The size of the membrane pores was found to be the main factor affecting ARG removal, and the fouling layer on the membrane also had an impact on the removal efficiency.
Low-pressure membrane filtration was investigated at pilot scale with regard to its removal of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) in conventional secondary treated wastewater plant effluents. While operating microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF) membranes, key operational parameters for antimicrobial resistance (AMR) studies and key factors influencing AMR removal efficiencies of low-pressure membrane filtration processes were examined. The main factor for AMR removal was the pore size of the membrane. The formation of the fouling layer on capillary membranes had only a small additive effect on intra- and extrachromosomal ARG removal and a significant additive effect on mobile ARG removal. Using feeds with different ARGs abundances revealed that higher ARG abundance in the feed resulted in higher ARG abundance in the filtrate. Live-Dead cell counting in UF filtrate showed intact bacteria breaking through the UF membrane. Strong correlations between 16S rRNA genes (as surrogate for bacteria quantification) and the sul1 gene in UF filtrate indicated ARBs likely breaking through UF membranes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available