4.6 Article

The effect of adenomyosis types on clinical outcomes of IVF embryo transfer after ultra-long GnRH agonist protocol

Journal

REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE
Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages 346-351

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.09.021

Keywords

Diffuse adenomyosis; Focal adenomyosis; IVF-ET; Ultra-long GnRH agonist protocol; Ultrasonography

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the effect of different types of adenomyosis on IVF-ET after ultra-long GnRH agonist protocol. The results showed that compared to focal adenomyosis or tubal infertility, patients with diffuse adenomyosis had worse reproduction outcomes in terms of clinical pregnancy and live birth, but had a higher risk of miscarriage. Focal adenomyosis was also associated with an increased risk of miscarriage compared to patients with tubal infertility.
Research question: What is the effect of adenomyosis types on IVF and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) after ultra-long gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol?Design: Patients who underwent the first cycle of IVF-ET with ultra-long GnRH agonist protocol were included in this retrospective cohort study. They were divided into three groups: (A) 428 patients with diffuse adenomyosis; (B) 718 patients with focal adenomyosis; and (C) 519 patients with tubal infertility. Reproduction outcomes were analysed.Results: Logistic regression analysis revealed that, compared with focal adenomyosis and tubal infertility, diffuse adenomyosis was negatively associated with clinical pregnancy and live birth (clinical pregnancy: A versus B: OR 0.708, 95% CI 0.539 to 0.931, P = 0.013; A versus C: OR 0.663, 95% CI 0.489 to 0.899, P = 0.008; live birth: A versus B: OR 0.530, 95% CI 0.385 to 0.730, P < 0.001; A versus C: OR 0.441, 95% CI 0.313 to 0.623, P < 0.001), but positively associated with miscarriage (A versus B: OR 1.727, 95% CI 1.056 to 2.825, P = 0.029; A versus C: OR 2.549, 95% CI 1.278 to 5.082, P = 0.008). Compared with patients with tubal infertility, focal adenomyosis was also a risk factor for miscarriage (B versus C: OR 1.825, 95% CI 1.112 to 2.995, P = 0.017).Conclusions: Compared with patients with focal adenomyosis or tubal infertility, the reproduction outcomes of IVF-ET in patients with diffuse adenomyosis seems to be worse.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available