4.7 Article

Co-pyrolysis and co-combustion of orange peel and biomass blends: Kinetics, thermodynamic, and ANN application

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 198, Issue -, Pages 399-414

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.08.049

Keywords

Biomass; Orange peel; Blending; Pyrolysis; Combustion; Kinetics

Funding

  1. Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia, under the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) [FRGS/1/2018/TK10/MUSM/03/1]
  2. Monash University Malaysia campus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Co-pyrolysis and co-combustion of orange peel, oil palm shell, and empty fruit bunch biomass were studied using a thermogravimetric analyzer. Blending different biomasses altered the thermogravimetry and derivative thermogravimetry profiles, indicating multiple reactions. Biomass blends showed a strong synergetic effect during char formation.
Co-pyrolysis and co-combustion of orange peel, oil palm shell, and empty fruit bunch biomass with and without blends were investigated in a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA) at 5, 10, 15, and 20 C/min heating rate. The kinetic parameters were calculated using the model-free and model-fitting methods. Results showed that blending altered the thermogravimetry (TG) and derivative thermogravimetry (DTG) profiles and indicated the existence of multiple reactions. Biomass blends showed a strong synergetic effect, specifically during the char formation. The average activation energy was a function of conversion degree, and the values for the biomass blends were 82-120 kJ/mol compared to their parent biomass (64-111 kJ/mol). The trained artificial neural network model predicted the TG profiles of biomass blends with high R(2 )values (>= 0.9), but the prediction ac-curacy was relatively poor for DTG profiles (<= 0.8). Overall, mixing orange peel waste and oil palm biomass altered the thermo-chemical behavior and kinetics, which could develop a new dimension for future studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available