4.8 Article

Just transitions for industrial decarbonisation: A framework for innovation, participation, and justice

Journal

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
Volume 167, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112699

Keywords

Industrialclusters; Justtransitions; Evaluativeframework; Systematicreview

Funding

  1. Industrial Decarbonisation Research and Innovation Centre (IDRIC) in the United Kingdom via ESRC and EPSRC [EP/V027050/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article proposes a framework for considering the justice issues of industrial cluster decarbonisation. The framework abstracts relevant themes from multiple literatures and illustrates their empirical relevance. The main themes of the framework include politics, space, and institutions; new processes and procedures; and correlates of acceptance and resistance. The framework can guide the design and evaluation of just transition processes.
Here we propose a framework for considering the justice issues of industrial cluster decarbonisation, a pressing challenge confronting many industrialised economies. Industrial clusters are large, multi-point source emitters, users of energy and employers of regional and national significance. In the UK, establishing low carbon industrial clusters is one of several grand challenges of industrial strategy. Theorising the just transition of industrial clusters requires concepts from multiple literatures. We abstract relevant themes from the intersections of the literatures of just transitions, innovation studies and sociotechnical transitions, and public participation in spatial planning, and illustrate their empirical relevance. The broad themes of our framework are (i) politics, space and institutions, with sub-themes of justice, democracy, financialization; (ii) new processes and procedures, with sub -themes of legal recognition of public concerns, community-based planning, community capacity enhancement and life cycle impact assessment; and (iii) correlates of acceptance and resistance, with sub-themes of envi-ronmental values, perceived loss of amenity, pre-existing politics, perceptions of just process and trust in the developer. The framework is intended to both guide the design of just transition processes ex-ante and evaluate these post-hoc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available