4.5 Article

Comparison of sitting and prone positions for real-time ultrasound-guided thoracic epidural catheter placement: a randomized controlled trial

Journal

REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE
Volume 47, Issue 12, Pages 738-743

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2022-103786

Keywords

Pain Management; Ultrasonography; Pain; Postoperative; Acute Pain

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study suggests that the prone position may be preferred for real-time ultrasound-guided thoracic epidural catheter placement (US-TECP), as it has better clinical usefulness, reducing needling time and the number of needle passes and skin punctures, and improving the first-pass success rate.
Introduction Real-time ultrasound-guided thoracic epidural catheter placement (US-TECP) has been recently introduced. Patient's position is associated with the success of spine interventions; however, the effects of position on the outcome of the procedure remain unknown. We aimed to assess the clinical usefulness of patient positioning during real-time US-TECP. Methods Patients were randomly assigned to the prone position group (group P) and sitting position group (group S). The primary outcome was needling time during the procedure. The secondary outcomes were time to mark space, total number of needle passes, number of skin punctures, first-pass success, final success, crossover success, and visibility of ultrasound (US) views. Global Rating Scale (GRS) score, Patient Comfort Scale score, procedural pain intensity, patient satisfaction, and procedure-related complications were also determined. Results Sixty-four patients were included in this study. The needling time was significantly shorter in group P than in group S (36.5 (26.5-51.0) vs 59.5 (34.5-152.0) s, p<0.01). The numbers of needle passes and skin punctures were significantly lesser in group P than in group S. First-pass success was higher in group P than in group S. Group P had higher GRS compared with group S. The time to mark space, final success, US visibility score, Patient Comfort Scale score, procedural pain intensity, and patient satisfaction did not differ between the groups. One patient in group S developed a vasovagal reaction. Discussion This study shows that prone position may be preferred for real-time US-TECP, considering its better clinical usefulness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available