4.7 Article

Re-definition of the region suitable for CO2/CH4 replacement into hydrates as a function of the thermodynamic difference between CO2 hydrate formation and dissociation

Journal

PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Volume 169, Issue -, Pages 132-141

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2022.10.085

Keywords

CO(2 )capture; Natural gas hydrates; CO2/CH4 replacement; Phase equilibrium; Process efficiency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The replacement of methane with carbon dioxide is the most promising solution for natural gas hydrate exploitation, but the actual efficiency is much lower than the ideal value. This article focuses on the suitable thermodynamic region for replacement. The region effectively suitable for replacement is narrower than previously believed and lies between the dissociation curve of methane hydrates and the formation curve of CO2 hydrates. Experimental results confirm that methane recovery is significantly higher when replacing above the dissociation curve.
The replacement of methane with a theoretically equal quantity of carbon dioxide, probably represents the most promising solution for natural gas hydrate exploitation. However, the real efficiency is far from the ideal value. This article aims to focus the attention on the thermodynamic area considered suitable for replacement. Because the formation and dissociation of hydrates always show differences between each other and, in particular, the formation always requires more severe conditions to occur, the region effectively suitable for replacement is still more narrow than what currently believed and consists of the area between the dissociation curve of methane hydrates and the formation curve of CO2 hydrates. The present hypothesis was confirmed by carrying out the replacement process both above and below this latter curve. It was found that the methane recovery was more than one order of magnitude higher in the first case: 43.32 against 4.19 vol%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available