4.7 Article

First experimental evidence for active farming in ambrosia beetles and strong heredity of garden microbiomes

Journal

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.1458

Keywords

cooperation; symbiosis; insect agriculture; metabarcoding; insect-fungus mutualism

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study experimentally demonstrated that fruit-tree pinhole borers are able to actively shift symbiont communities, thus engaging in active farming. The study also found that the beetles exhibit selective promotion and/or suppression of symbionts, though the exact mechanisms behind this behavior require further investigation.
Fungal cultivation is a defining feature for advanced agriculture in fungus-farming ants and termites. In a third supposedly fungus-farming group, wood-colonizing ambrosia beetles, an experimental proof for the effectiveness of beetle activity for selective promotion of their food fungi over others is lacking and farming has only been assumed based on observations of social and hygienic behaviours. Here, we experimentally removed mothers and their offspring from young nests of the fruit-tree pinhole borer, Xyleborinus saxesenii. By amplicon sequencing of bacterial and fungal communities of nests with and without beetles we could show that beetles are indeed able to actively shift symbiont communities. Although being consumed, the Raffaelea food fungi were more abundant when beetles were present while a weed fungus (Chaetomium sp.) as well as overall bacterial diversity were reduced in comparison to nests without beetles. Core symbiont communities were generally of low diversity and there were strong signs for vertical transmission not only for the cultivars, but also for secondary symbionts. Our findings verify the existence of active farming, even though the exact mechanisms underlying the selective promotion and/or suppression of symbionts need further investigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available