4.5 Article

Modelling cosmic radiation events in the tree-ring radiocarbon record

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2022.0497

Keywords

radiocarbon; Miyake events; carbon cycle; atmospheric carbon; solar flares

Funding

  1. UQ Winter and Summer Research Scholarships
  2. Inaugural UQ Fellowship of the Big Questions Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Annually resolved measurements of tree-ring radiocarbon content have revealed rare sharp rises, called 'Miyake events', which are likely caused by rare increases in cosmic radiation. These events challenge existing astrophysical or geophysical models, and analyzing them requires modeling the global carbon cycle. In this study, the researchers introduce an open-source Python package called 'ticktack' that connects box models of carbon cycle with Bayesian inference tools. Using this package, they analyze all public annual 14C tree data and infer posterior parameters for the six known Miyake events.
Annually resolved measurements of the radiocarbon content in tree-rings have revealed rare sharp rises in carbon-14 production. These 'Miyake events' are likely produced by rare increases in cosmic radiation from the Sun or other energetic astrophysical sources. The radiocarbon produced is not only circulated through the Earth's atmosphere and oceans, but also absorbed by the biosphere and locked in the annual growth rings of trees. To interpret high-resolution tree-ring radiocarbon measurements therefore necessitates modelling the entire global carbon cycle. Here, we introduce 'ticktack' (https://github.com/SharmaLlama/ticktack/), the first open-source Python package that connects box models of the carbon cycle with modern Bayesian inference tools. We use this to analyse all public annual 14C tree data, and infer posterior parameters for all six known Miyake events. They do not show a consistent relationship to the solar cycle, and several display extended durations that challenge either astrophysical or geophysical models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available