4.8 Article

A neural signature of the vividness of prospective thought is modulated by temporal proximity during intertemporal decision making

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2214072119

Keywords

fMRI; construal level theory; imagination; prospection; delay discounting

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [R01-CA-170297, R35-CA-197461]
  2. National Institute on Drug Abuse [R01-DA-029149]
  3. National Institute on Aging [P30 AG-012836-18]
  4. Boettner Center for Pensions and Retirement Security
  5. NIH National Institute of Child Health and Development Population Research Infrastructure Program [R24 HD-044964-9]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multiple theories in psychology suggest that people discount future rewards because they imagine them less vividly than immediate events, thereby reducing their perceived value. This study provides neuroscientific evidence for this proposal, showing that neural measures of vividness decline as rewards are delayed farther into the future.
Why do people discount future rewards? Multiple theories in psychology argue that one reason is that future events are imagined less vividly than immediate events, thereby diminishing their perceived value. Here we provide neuroscientific evidence for this proposal. First, we construct a neural signature of the vividness of prospective thought, using an fMRI dataset where the vividness of imagined future events is orthogonal to their valence by design. Then, we apply this neural signature in two additional fMRI datasets, each using a different delay-discounting task, to show that neural measures of vividness decline as rewards are delayed farther into the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available