4.8 Article

Comparative genomics of mortal and immortal cnidarians unveils novel keys behind rejuvenation

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2118763119

Keywords

aging; reprogramming; polycomb; pluripotency; Turritopsis

Funding

  1. European Research Council (DeAge, ERC Advanced Grant) [742067]
  2. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion-FEDER [SAF201787655-R, PID2020-118394RB-I00, RTI2018-096859-B-I00]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [742067] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research has found that Turritopsis dohrnii has the ability to regenerate, and this ability is associated with variations and expansions of several genes related to replication, DNA repair, telomere maintenance, stem cell population, and intercellular communication. Furthermore, during its life cycle reversal process, silencing of polycomb repressive complex 2 targets and activation of pluripotency targets are proposed to be key factors in T. dohrnii's ability to undergo rejuvenation.
Turritopsis dohrnii is the only metazoan able to rejuvenate repeatedly after its medusae reproduce, hinting at biological immortality and challenging our understanding of aging. We present and compare whole-genome assemblies of T. dohrnii and the nonimmortal Turritopsis rubra using automatic and manual annotations, together with the transcriptome of life cycle reversal (LCR) process of T. dohrnii. We have identified variants and expansions of genes associated with replication, DNA repair, telomere maintenance, redox environment, stem cell population, and intercellular communication. Moreover, we have found silencing of polycomb repressive complex 2 targets and activation of pluripotency targets during LCR, which points to these transcription factors as pluripotency inducers in T. dohrnii. Accordingly, we propose these factors as key elements in the ability of T. dohrnii to undergo rejuvenation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available