4.5 Article

Uptake of baits by wild badgers: Influences of deployment method, badger age and activity patterns on potential delivery of an oral vaccine

Journal

PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE
Volume 206, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105702

Keywords

Badger; BCG; Bovine tuberculosis; Oral vaccination; Bait uptake; Wildlife disease

Funding

  1. United Kingdom Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) [SE3246]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the factors influencing the uptake of candidate oral vaccine baits in wild badger populations. The results showed that cubs had a higher uptake rate than adults, and placing the baits directly into sett entrances resulted in a higher uptake rate. Season, bait type, and packaging did not affect uptake, while increasing the quantity of bait available increased uptake in cubs but not in adults. Additionally, levels of badger activity at setts were positively associated with bait uptake.
In parts of the United Kingdom and Ireland, the European badger is a wildlife host for Mycobacterium bovis (the causative agent of bovine tuberculosis). Badger vaccination is one management option for reducing disease spread. Vaccination is currently achieved by parenteral vaccination of captured badgers, but an oral vaccine delivered in a bait may provide an additional approach in the future. We conducted two field experiments in wild badger populations to identify factors that influence uptake (% of individuals with evidence of bait consumption) of candidate oral vaccine baits. In both instances, baits containing the biomarker iophenoxic acid (as a proxy for the vaccine) were fed at burrows (setts) associated with badger social groups (study A = 48 groups, study B = 40 groups). Badgers were captured following a period of bait deployment to quantify uptake in relation to age, sex and social group. In addition, groups were allocated different treatments and the bait deployment protocol was varied to identify effects on uptake. Study A tested the effects of season, bait type, bait placement and packaging, while study B investigated the effects of bait quantity and badger activity levels. Overall bait uptake was low (Study A = 24 %, Study B = 37 %) but this varied among treatment groups (range 0-58 %). In both studies, bait uptake was significantly higher in cubs than in adults. Uptake was substantially higher where baits were placed directly into sett entrances (rather than under tiles near setts), and by badgers caught at main setts rather than at outlier setts. Season, bait type and packaging did not influence uptake, while increasing the quantity of bait available increased uptake by cubs but not by adults. Levels of badger activity at setts varied over time (suggesting potential disturbance), but were positively associated with levels of bait uptake.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available