4.5 Article

Preparation of porous biodegradable PLLA with tunable pore size through simple variation of PEG/PLLA-blend crystallization conditions

Journal

POLYMERS FOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages 398-404

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pat.5898

Keywords

blends; crystallization; degradation; PLLA; porous

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, porous poly(L-lactic acid) (PLLA) films were prepared using a low-cost approach with poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and solution casting. The crystallization conditions were adjusted to control the pore size and structure of the PLLA films. Higher crystallization temperatures resulted in larger pores and slower degradation rates, indicating potential applications in drug delivery and tissue engineering.
In this study, porous poly(L-lactic acid) (PLLA) films are prepared via a facile and low-cost approach using poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and solution casting. In contrast to most studies, the PEG/PLLA samples are further processed under different crystallization conditions (i.e., different PLLA crystallization temperatures) before PEG removal. As the PEG is extracted via solvent at higher PLLA crystallization temperatures, the resultant PLLA samples have larger pores. Interconnected fibrillar-shaped pores are found in all systems, and the fibrillar-porous structure width is similar to 150 nm-1.2 mu m, as observed via scanning electron microscopy. These pore sizes can be tuned by adjusting the blend composition and crystallization temperature. In addition, PEG/PLLA blends are subjected to hydrolytic degradation analysis according to their crystallization conditions. Higher PLLA crystallization temperature yields higher PLLA crystallinity and larger pores, as well as reduced surface interaction with water. Therefore, the PLLA degradation rate is decreased. The developed PLLA films have potential applications in drug delivery and tissue engineering.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available