4.3 Article

Plastic and other anthropogenic debris in Arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus) faeces from Iceland

Journal

POLAR BIOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 8, Pages 1403-1413

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00300-022-03075-8

Keywords

Arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus); Iceland; Plastic; Anthropogenic debris; Debris ingestion; Monitoring

Funding

  1. Environment Agency of Iceland, Umhverfisstofnun, Suourlandsbraut, Reykjavik, Iceland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the potential of using Arctic fox feces as a monitoring tool for plastic pollution in the Arctic environment. The results showed that plastic and other anthropogenic debris were found in fecal samples from different regions and years, but the overall uptake was low and the source of debris was unclear, making data interpretation difficult.
Anthropogenic debris, including plastic pollution, is a growing concern in the Arctic and negatively impacts both marine and coastal organisms. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential for using Arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus) faeces as a monitoring tool for plastic pollution in the Arctic environment. Arctic fox faeces were collected in different regions of Iceland and analysed for anthropogenic debris presence larger than 300 mu m, and diet composition. In total, 235 faecal samples from 1999, 2017, 2018 and 2020 were analysed. The overall frequency of occurrence of plastic and other anthropogenic material was 5.11% and was found in samples across all regions and years. There were no statistical differences in anthropogenic debris ingested, depending on year or region. There were no obvious differences in diet composition between samples that contained anthropogenic debris and samples without. The suitability of Arctic fox faeces as a method to monitor plastic and anthropogenic debris levels in the Arctic environment remains debatable: Whilst the vast distribution range of the Arctic fox and the non-invasive collection methodology of faecal samples could be utilised as a good monitoring tool, the overall low uptake and unclear source of plastic and anthropogenic debris (marine or terrestrial) makes the interpretation of the data difficult. Nevertheless, debris ingestion by Arctic foxes remains a concern and warrants further studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available