4.6 Article

Age differences in functioning and contextual factors in community-dwelling stroke survivors: A national cross-sectional survey

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273644

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Icelandic Centre for Research [IRF 196034]
  2. Icelandic Physiotherapy Association
  3. Icelandic Federation of Aging

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to map functioning and contextual factors among community-dwelling stroke survivors after first stroke, based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). The results showed that older stroke survivors reported more anxiety and depression, and had lower scores in activities of daily living and mobility compared to younger stroke survivors. The study also highlighted the importance of analyzing subgroups of age in the heterogenous group of older individuals in this population.
Background Our study aimed to map functioning and contextual factors among community-dwelling stroke survivors after first stroke, based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), and to explore if these factors differ among older-old (75 years and older), younger-old (65-74 years), and young (18-65 years) stroke survivors. Methods A cross-sectional population-based national survey among community-dwelling stroke survivors, 1-2 years after their first stroke. Potential participants were approached through hospital registries. The survey had 56.2% response rate. Participants (N = 114, 50% men), 27 to 94 years old (71.6 +/- 12.9 years), were categorized as: older-old (n = 51), younger-old (n = 34) and young (n = 29). They answered questions on health, functioning and contextual factors, the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) and the Behavioural Regulation Exercise Questionnaire-2. Descriptive analysis was used, along with analysis of variance for continuous data and Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables. TukeyHSD, was used for comparing possible age-group pairings. Results The responses reflected ICF's personal and environmental factors as well as body function, activities, and participation. Comparisons between age-groups revealed that the oldest participants reported more anxiety and depression and used more walking devices and fewer smart devices than individuals in both the younger-old and young groups. In the SIS, the oldest participants had lower scores than both younger groups in the domains of activities of daily living and mobility. Conclusion These findings provide important information on needs and opportunities in community based rehabilitation for first-time stroke survivors and reveal that this population has good access to smart devices which can be used in community integration. Moreover, our results support the need for analysis in subgroups of age among the heterogenous group of older individuals in this population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available