4.5 Article

Growth and glucosinolate profiles of Eruca sativa (Mill.) (rocket salad) and Diplotaxis tenuifolia (L.) DC. under different LED lighting regimes

Journal

PLANT SOIL AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 68, Issue 10, Pages 466-478

Publisher

CZECH ACADEMY AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.17221/44/2022-PSE

Keywords

salad vegetables; antioxidant compounds; light; abiotic stress; phytohormone

Categories

Funding

  1. Slovenian Research Agency
  2. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Food of the Republic of Slovenia
  3. CRP
  4. [V4-1815]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the growth and glucosinolate profiles of rocket salad Eruca sativa and Diplotaxis tenuifolia under different lighting conditions. The results showed that light treatment had a significant impact on plant growth and glucosinolate accumulation.
In this study, the growth and glucosinolate (GSL) profiles of rocket salad Eruca sativa (Mill.) and Diplotaxis tenuifolia (L.) DC. were determined during 30 days growing under different lighting regimes; T5_ peak at 545 nm, LED1_ peak at 631 nm and LED2_ peak at 598 nm. The biggest increase of dry weight (DW) was measured in E. sativa under T5 (0.657 g DW/plant) and the lowest in D. tenuifolia under LED1 (0.080 g DW/plant). GSL content was found to vary significantly, regardless of the light treatment, but it is related with genotype (E. sativa, r = 0.802**). On average, the highest amount of 4-methylsulfinylbutyl-GSL (glucosativin) (7.3248 mg/g DW) was quantified in E. sativa and D. tenuifolia (6.7428 mg/g DW) under the T5. The regression analysis between different light wavelengths and glucosinolates showed the strongest correlation between photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD_B) and 4-methylthiobutyl-GSL (glucoerucin) in E. sativa (r = 0.698*) and D. tenuifolia (r = 0.693*), respectively, which indicates the effect of light on the response of plants to induced stress and changes in GSL biosynthesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available