4.7 Article

Acquisition of hypoxia inducibility by oxygen sensing N-terminal cysteine oxidase in spermatophytes

Journal

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages 322-338

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pce.14440

Keywords

cysteine oxidation; hypoxia; N-degron pathway; oxygen sensing; plant evolution; regulation of gene expression

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

N-terminal cysteine oxidases (NCOs) oxidise the N-terminal cysteine of specific proteins, initiating proteolytic N-degron pathway. Both types of PCOs regulate the anaerobic response in angiosperms.
N-terminal cysteine oxidases (NCOs) use molecular oxygen to oxidise the amino-terminal cysteine of specific proteins, thereby initiating the proteolytic N-degron pathway. To expand the characterisation of the plant family of NCOs (plant cysteine oxidases [PCOs]), we performed a phylogenetic analysis across different taxa in terms of sequence similarity and transcriptional regulation. Based on this survey, we propose a distinction of PCOs into two main groups. A-type PCOs are conserved across all plant species and are generally unaffected at the messenger RNA level by oxygen availability. Instead, B-type PCOs appeared in spermatophytes to acquire transcriptional regulation in response to hypoxia. The inactivation of two A-type PCOs in Arabidopsis thaliana, PCO4 and PCO5, is sufficient to activate the anaerobic response in young seedlings, whereas the additional removal of B-type PCOs leads to a stronger induction of anaerobic genes and impairs plant growth and development. Our results show that both PCO types are required to regulate the anaerobic response in angiosperms. Therefore, while it is possible to distinguish two clades within the PCO family, we conclude that they all contribute to restrain the anaerobic transcriptional programme in normoxic conditions and together generate a molecular switch to toggle the hypoxic response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available