4.2 Article

Torpor Does Not Influence Spatial Memory in Hibernating Golden-Mantled Ground Squirrels (Spermophilus [Callospermophilus] lateralis)*

Journal

PHYSIOLOGICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL ZOOLOGY
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages 390-399

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/721185

Keywords

hibernation; spatial memory; torpor; Barnes maze

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [IOS 1655091, IOB 0448396]
  2. National Institutes of Health [2 P20 RR016464]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the long-term spatial memory retention during hibernation in ground squirrels and finds marked variation between individuals. Some squirrels are able to retain memory across multiple torpor bouts, while others are not. The results suggest that the remodeling of dendritic spines during torpor does not always lead to memory loss.
Mammalian hibernation in ground squirrels is characterized by periods of torpor wherein body temperature approaches ambient temperature and metabolism is reduced to as low as 1/100th of active rates. It is unclear how hibernation affects long-term spatial memory, as tremendous remodeling of neurons is associated with torpor use. Given the suspected links between remodeling and memory formation and retention, we examined long-term spatial memory retention throughout a hibernation season. Animals were trained on a Barnes maze before entering torpor. Animals were tested for memory retention once a month throughout a hibernation season. Results indicate marked variation between individuals. Some squirrels retained memory across multiple torpor bouts, while other squirrels did not. No relationship was found between the number of torpor bouts, duration of bouts, or time spent torpid on long-term memory retention. However, that some squirrels successfully retain memory suggests that the profound remodeling of dendritic spines during torpor does not always lead to memory loss.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available