4.7 Article

Characterizing the initial conditions of heavy-ion collisions at the LHC with mean transverse momentum and anisotropic flow correlations

Journal

PHYSICS LETTERS B
Volume 834, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137393

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Worldwide LHC Computing Grid (WLCG)
  2. A. I. Alikhanyan National Science Laboratory (Yerevan Physics Institute) Foundation (ANSL), State Committee of Science and World Federation of Scientists (WFS), Armenia
  3. Austrian Academy of Sciences, Austrian Science Fund (FWF), Austria [M 2467-N36]
  4. Nationalstiftung fur Forschung, Technologie und Entwicklung, Austria
  5. Ministry of Communications and High Technologies, National Nuclear Research Center, Azerbaijan
  6. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq), Brazil
  7. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (Finep), Brazil
  8. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP), Brazil
  9. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Brazil
  10. Ministry of Education of China (MOEC)
  11. Ministry of Science AMP
  12. Technology of China (MSTC)
  13. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), China
  14. Ministry of Science and Education and Croatian Science Foundation, Croatia
  15. Centro de Aplicaciones Tecnologicas y Desarrollo Nuclear (CEADEN), Cubaenergia, Cuba
  16. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic, Czech Republic
  17. Danish Council for Independent Research | Natural Sciences, Denmark
  18. Villum Fondenand Danish National Research Foundation (DNRF), Denmark
  19. Helsinki Institute of Physics (HIP), Finland
  20. Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique (CEA), France
  21. Institut National de Physique Nucleaire et de Physique des Particules (IN2P3), France
  22. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), France
  23. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), Germany
  24. GSI Helmholtzzentrum fur Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Germany
  25. General Secretariat for Research and Technology, Ministry of Education, Research and Religions, Greece
  26. National Research, Development and Innovation Office, Hungary
  27. Department of Atomic Energy Government of India (DAE), India
  28. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India (DST), India
  29. University Grants Commission, Government of India (UGC), India
  30. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India
  31. Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Indonesia
  32. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Italy
  33. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT)
  34. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI
  35. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Applied Science (IIST), Japan
  36. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia (CONACYT) y Tecnologia, through Fondo de Cooperacion Internacional en Ciencia y Tecnologia (FONCICYT)
  37. Direccion General de Asuntos del Personal Academico (DGAPA), Mexico
  38. Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO), Netherlands
  39. Research Council of Norway, Norway
  40. Commission on Science and Technology for Sustainable Development in the South (COMSATS), Pakistan
  41. Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru, Peru
  42. Ministry of Education and Science, Poland
  43. National Science Centre and WUT IDUB, Poland
  44. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, Republic of Korea
  45. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), Republic of Korea
  46. Ministry of Education and Scientific Research, Institute of Atomic Physics, Romania
  47. Ministry of Research and Innovation and Institute of Atomic Physics, Romania
  48. University Politehnica of Bucharest, Romania
  49. Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR), Russia
  50. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, Russia
  51. National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute, Russia
  52. Russian Science Foundation, Russia
  53. Russian Foundation for Basic Research, Russia
  54. Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic, Slovakia
  55. National Research Foundation of South Africa, South Africa
  56. Swedish Research Council, Sweden
  57. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation(KAW), Sweden
  58. European Organization for Nuclear Research, Switzerland
  59. Suranaree University of Technology (SUT), Thailand
  60. National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSDTA), Thailand
  61. Office of the Higher Education Commission under NRU project of Thailand, Thailand
  62. Turkish Energy, Nuclear and Mineral Research Agency (TENMAK), Turkey
  63. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine
  64. Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC), United Kingdom
  65. National Science Foundation of the United States of America (NSF), United States of America
  66. United States Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Physics (DOE NP), United States of America

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Correlations between mean transverse momentum [P-T] and anisotropic flow coefficients v(2) or v(3) are measured as a function of centrality in Pb-Pb and Xe-Xe collisions at root(NN)-N-s = 5.02 TeV and 5.44 TeV, respectively, with ALICE. These measurements provide insights into the initial state and help reduce the uncertainty in extracting properties of the quark-gluon plasma in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. The data are better described by the IP-Glasma model than the T(R)ENTo model.
Correlations between mean transverse momentum [P-T] and anisotropic flow coefficients v(2) or v(3) are measured as a function of centrality in Pb-Pb and Xe-Xe collisions at root(NN)-N-s = 5.02 TeV and 5.44 TeV, respectively, with ALICE. In addition, the recently proposed higher-order correlation between [P-T], v(2), and v(3) is measured for the first time, which shows an anticorrelation for the presented centrality ranges. These measurements are compared with hydrodynamic calculations using IP-Glasma and T(R)ENTo initial-state shapes, the former based on the Color Glass Condensate effective theory with gluon saturation, and the latter a parameterized model with nucleons as the relevant degrees of freedom. The data are better described by the IP-Glasma rather than the T(R)ENTo based calculations. In particular, Trajectum and JETSCAPE predictions, both based on the T(R)ENTo initial state model but with different parameter settings, fail to describe the measurements. As the correlations between [P-T] and v(n) are mainly driven by the correlations of the size and the shape of the system in the initial state, these new studies pave a novel way to characterize the initial state and help pin down the uncertainty of the extracted properties of the quark-gluon plasma recreated in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available