Journal
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
Volume 67, Issue 18, Pages -Publisher
IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac8044
Keywords
knowledge-based planning; radiotherapy; optimization; inverse problem; inverse optimization; automated planning; open data
Funding
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study establishes an open framework for developing plan optimization models for knowledge-based planning (KBP). By analyzing the treatment data of 100 head-and-neck cancer patients, it is found that the quality of predictions is generally positively correlated with the quality of plans. The KBP pipelines generated better plans compared to the predictions and the framework is also applicable to inverse planning models. Moreover, this study provides valuable data and code for further research in this field.
Objective. To establish an open framework for developing plan optimization models for knowledge-based planning (KBP). Approach. Our framework includes radiotherapy treatment data (i.e. reference plans) for 100 patients with head-and-neck cancer who were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. That data also includes high-quality dose predictions from 19 KBP models that were developed by different research groups using out-of-sample data during the OpenKBP Grand Challenge. The dose predictions were input to four fluence-based dose mimicking models to form 76 unique KBP pipelines that generated 7600 plans (76 pipelines x 100 patients). The predictions and KBP-generated plans were compared to the reference plans via: the dose score, which is the average mean absolute voxel-by-voxel difference in dose; the deviation in dose-volume histogram (DVH) points; and the frequency of clinical planning criteria satisfaction. We also performed a theoretical investigation to justify our dose mimicking models. Main results. The range in rank order correlation of the dose score between predictions and their KBP pipelines was 0.50-0.62, which indicates that the quality of the predictions was generally positively correlated with the quality of the plans. Additionally, compared to the input predictions, the KBP-generated plans performed significantly better (P < 0.05; one-sided Wilcoxon test) on 18 of 23 DVH points. Similarly, each optimization model generated plans that satisfied a higher percentage of criteria than the reference plans, which satisfied 3.5% more criteria than the set of all dose predictions. Lastly, our theoretical investigation demonstrated that the dose mimicking models generated plans that are also optimal for an inverse planning model. Significance. This was the largest international effort to date for evaluating the combination of KBP prediction and optimization models. We found that the best performing models significantly outperformed the reference dose and dose predictions. In the interest of reproducibility, our data and code is freely available.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available