4.3 Article

Boron Arsenate Scaled-Up: An Enhanced Nano-Mimicking Mechanical Metamaterial

Journal

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.202200368

Keywords

auxetic; mechanical metamaterials; mechanical properties; negative Poisson's ratio

Funding

  1. Malta Council for Science & Technology through FUSION: The R & I Technology Development Programme 2018 [R I-2017-033-T]
  2. University of Malta

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Inspired by single crystal boron arsenate, novel mechanical metamaterials are built at the macroscale using conventional materials and investigated through finite element simulations. These metamaterials can mimic the properties of boron arsenate, with the rotating rigid-units mechanism being excellently replicated and even made more efficient through modifications of the geometry. The study confirms that existing materials can provide useful information for designing novel mechanical metamaterials with enhanced auxetic properties.
Novel mechanical metamaterials inspired by single crystal boron arsenate built at the macroscale using conventional materials are presented and investigated through finite element simulations. It is shown that these mechanical metamaterials can mimic, to some extent, the properties of boron arsenate with the more robust rotating rigid-units mechanism being excellently replicated and even made to operate more efficiently through modifications of the geometry of the mechanical metamaterial. It is also shown that not all mechanisms causing auxeticity at the nanoscale can be upscaled due to the absence of the appropriate interactions at higher length scales. This confirms that already existing materials, which have been adequately characterized and studied, can prove to be a very useful source of information for the design of novel mechanical metamaterials which can exhibit even more auxetic properties than the original material itself.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available