4.6 Article

Modelling and simulating serpentine group behaviour in crowds using modified social force model

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2022.127674

Keywords

Group behaviour; Social force model; Kumbh Mela; Modelling and simulation; Mass religious gathering

Funding

  1. Ministry of Electronics and IT, Government of India [MITO-0105]
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, NWO [629.002.202]
  3. Robert Bosch Center for Cyber Physical Systems, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore [RBCO001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper uncovers an intriguing behavior observed in the world's largest mass religious gathering, Kumbh Mela-2016, known as serpentine group behavior. The authors develop a modified social force model to model and simulate this behavior, aiming to aid in the development of a realistic crowd simulation model that can handle unique crowd behaviors and ensure safe movement.
Crowd dynamics has emerged as an important topic of investigation in recent years. Several studies have been conducted to better understand the underlying factors that can influence crowd dynamics and lead to risky situations. Particularly, field studies are essential for realistically capturing the dynamics. This paper attempts to uncover one intriguing behaviour observed in the world's largest mass religious gathering Kumbh Mela-2016, held in Ujjain, India. The authors define this behaviour, where groups attempt to overtake the others in the crowd, form flexible chains, and not allow non-group members to penetrate through them, as serpentine group behaviour. This behaviour has been modelled and simulated using a modified social force model which has been developed in this work. This can aid in the development of a realistic crowd simulation model that can handle such unique crowd behaviours and help manage large crowds and ensure safe movement. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available