4.7 Review

Extracellular vesicles in pancreatic cancer immune escape: Emerging roles and mechanisms

Journal

PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 183, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106364

Keywords

Pancreatic cancer; Extracellular vesicles; Immune escape; Tumor immune; Microenvironment; Exosomes; Cancer immunotherapy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review aims to explore the role of extracellular vesicles (EVs) in immune escape in pancreatic cancer (PC) and their potential in cancer immunotherapy. Despite significant progress in clinical trials of immunotherapies for various cancers, the effectiveness of immunotherapy is still low in PC, possibly due to immune evasion mechanisms. Therefore, investigating the role of EVs in immune escape in PC is crucial for developing more effective immunotherapies.
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is the most lethal malignancy worldwide due to its delayed diagnosis and limited treatment options. Despite great progress in clinical trials of immunotherapies for various cancers, their effectiveness in PC is very low, indicating that immune evasion is still a major obstacle to immunotherapy in PC. However, the mechanism of immune escape in PC is not fully understood, which substantially restricts the development of immunotherapy. As an important component of intercellular communication networks, extracellular vesicles (EVs) have attracted increasing attention in relation to immune escape. This review aims to provide a better understanding of the roles of EVs in tumor immune escape and the potential to expand their application in cancer immunotherapy. The relationship between PC and the tumor immune microenvironment is briefly introduced. Then, the mechanism by which EVs are involved in immune regulation is summarized, and the latest progress in determining the role of EVs in regulating PC immune escape is highlighted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available