4.6 Review

Neurodevelopmental consequences of preterm punctate white matter lesions: a systematic review

Journal

PEDIATRIC RESEARCH
Volume 93, Issue 6, Pages 1480-1490

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41390-022-02232-3

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the influence of punctate white matter lesions (PWML) on long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. The findings showed a correlation between PWML and motor delay, as well as between PWML and cognitive and behavioral outcomes. The severity and types of impairments were found to be related to the number and location of PWML.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate punctate white matter lesion (PWML) influence in preterm infants on the long-term neurodevelopmental outcome (NDO). METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE were searched from January 1, 2000, to May 31, 2021. Studies were included in which PWML in preterm infants on MRI around term-equivalent age (TEA) and NDO at >= 12 months were reported. Study and patient characteristics and NDO on motor, cognitive, and behavioral domains were extracted. The quality of studies was assessed using the Cochraneapproved Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. RESULTS: This analysis included nine studies with a total of 1655 patients. Mean incidence of isolated PWML was 22.1%. All studies showed a relationship between PWML and motor delay. Two studies found a significant correlation between cognitive and behavioral outcomes and PWML. Number and PWML location are related to severity and impairment types. LIMITATIONS: PWML were not always separately described from generalized WMI, only studies with imaging around TEA were included, and studies were heterogenic in design and quality. CONCLUSIONS: PWML is common in preterm infants and predictive of adverse NDO, in particular on motor outcomes and less on cognitive and behavioral outcomes. The type and severity of impairments are related to the number and location of PMWL.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available