4.4 Article

Rhabdomyosarcoma xenotransplants in zebrafish embryos

Journal

PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER
Volume 70, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.30053

Keywords

rhabdomyosarcoma; RMS; xenograft; zebrafish embryo

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new zebrafish-based xenotransplant model was established for rapid and accessible drug screening in pediatric soft tissue sarcomas. Chemotherapy drugs with clinical anti-tumor efficacy were shown to significantly reduce tumor size in proof-of-principle experiments. This zebrafish model can be a valuable addition to existing models and offer a cost-effective solution for preclinical drug testing.
Rhabdomyosarcomas (RMS) are the most common pediatric soft tissue sarcomas. High-risk and metastatic disease continues to be associated with very poor prognosis. RMS model systems that faithfully recapitulate the human disease and provide rapid, cost-efficient estimates of antitumor efficacy of candidate drugs are needed to facilitate drug development and personalized medicine approaches. Here, we present a new zebrafish-based xenotransplant model allowing for rapid and easily accessible drug screening using low numbers of viable tumor cells and relatively small amounts of water-soluble chemicals. Under optimized temperature conditions, embryonal RMS xenografts were established in zebrafish embryos at 3 h postfertilization (hpf). In proof-of-principle experiments, chemotherapy drugs with established clinical anti-RMS efficacy (vincristine, dactinomycin) and the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitor trametinib were shown to significantly reduce the cross-sectional area of the tumors by 120 hpf. RMS xenograft models in zebrafish embryos henceforth could serve as a valuable addition to cell culture and mammalian models of RMS and represent a rapid and cost-effective solution for preclinical candidate drug testing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available