4.5 Article

IDH-mutant astrocytoma with an evolutional progression to CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion and NTRK fusion during recurrence: A case report

Journal

PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE
Volume 239, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2022.154163

Keywords

IDH -mutant astrocytoma; CDKN2A; B; NTRK2; NGS-custom panel

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reported a case of IDH-mutant astrocytoma that recurred with aggressive behavior and increased malignancy, showing genomic evolution during tumor recurrence. The recurrent tumors carried NTRK fusion and CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion, which may promote high-grade transformation and indicate an unfavorable prognosis for IDH-mutant astrocytoma.
We reported a case of molecularly defined isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant astrocytoma that recurred twice with aggressive behavior and increased anaplastic morphology. Primary and recurrent tumors were analyzed using custom-made DNA-based cancer gene and RNA-based fusion panels for next-generation sequencing (NGS). NGS analyses revealed that recurrent astrocytoma, in addition to IDH1 and tumor protein 53 mutations detected in the primary lesion, harbored cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor (CDKN) 2 A/B homozygous deletion and neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase 2 (NTRK2) fusion genes that consisted of golgin A1- and cyclin-dependent kinase 5 regulatory subunit associated protein 2-NTRK2 fusions. Anaplasia and necrosis were observed in the recurrent tumors, but not in the primary lesion. Therefore, the integrative diagnosis was primary IDH-mutant astrocytoma grade 2 and recurrent IDH-mutant astrocytoma grade 4 with NTRK2 fusions. This is a worthwhile report describing a case of IDH-mutant astrocytoma that showed genomic evolution during tumor recurrence. Our report suggests that NTRK fusion and CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion promote high-grade transformation and indicate an unfavorable prognosis of IDH-mutant astrocytoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available