4.6 Article

Randomized phase 3 noninferiority trial of radiotherapy and cisplatin vs radiotherapy and cetuximab after docetaxel-cisplatin-fluorouracil induction chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced unresectable head and neck cancer

Journal

ORAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 134, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.106087

Keywords

Cisplatin; Cetuximab; LA-SCCHN; Unresectable; Induction chemotherapy; TPF

Funding

  1. The Spanish Cooperative Group for the treatment of Head & Neck Cancer (TTCC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of concomitant cetuximab plus radiotherapy (cet+RT) vs cisplatin plus radiotherapy (cis+RT) in patients with unresectable, locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA-SCCHN) who were responsive to induction chemotherapy (ICT). The results showed no significant difference in overall survival, progression-free survival, overall response rates, or adverse event rates between the two treatment groups. However, late neurotoxicity was more severe with cis+RT than cet+RT, and improvements in quality of life were observed with cet+RT compared to cis+RT.
Objectives: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for patients with unresectable, locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA-SCCHN); induction chemotherapy (ICT) may provide survival benefits in some patients. This study aimed to demonstrate the noninferiority of concomitant cetuximab plus radiotherapy (cet+RT) vs cisplatin plus radiotherapy (cis+RT) in patients with unresectable LA-SCCHN who were responsive to ICT.Materials and methods: This randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial studied patients with unresectable LA-SCCHN who received 3 cycles of ICT (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil; TPF) followed by cis+RT (standard arm) or cet+RT (experimental arm). The primary endpoint was noninferiority of the experimental arm vs the standard arm in terms of overall survival (OS), based on a hazard ratio (HR) of < 1.3. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall response, safety, and quality of life (QOL).Results: Between July 15, 2008, and July 5, 2013, 519 patients were recruited and started ICT; 407 patients received post-ICT treatment (cis+RT, n = 205; cet+RT, n = 202). At a median follow-up of 43.9 (cis+RT) and 41.1 (cet+RT) months, median OS was 63.6 and 42.9 months with cis+RT and cet+RT, respectively (HR [90% CI] = 1.106 [0.888-1.378], P =.4492). There were no differences in progression-free survival, overall response rates, or adverse event rates between groups. There was greater late neurotoxicity with cis+RT than cet+RT (P =.0058). Several QOL dimensions improved with cet+RT vs cis+RT (physical functioning, P=.0287; appetite loss, P=.0248; social contact, P=.0153).Conclusion: Noninferiority of cet+RT over cis+RT was not demonstrated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available