4.6 Article

Sub-shot-noise-limited phase estimation via single-mode inputs

Journal

OPTICS EXPRESS
Volume 30, Issue 24, Pages 43143-43156

Publisher

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OE.474643

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12104193]
  2. Natural Science Research of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China [21KJB140007]
  3. Shuangchuang Ph.D Award [JSSCBS20210915]
  4. Project for Leading Innovative Talents in Changzhou [CQ20210107]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the phase sensitivity limits of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer with specific scenarios and optimal single-mode input choices, as well as the effects of several realistic factors on phase sensitivity.
In 1981, Caves pointed out that the phase sensitivity of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer with single-mode inputs is bounded by the shot-noise limit. The quantum Fisher information analysis shows that this statement holds true for the scenario where two antisymmetric phase shifts occur in two arms, but it is invalid for the scenario where an unknown phase is embedded in one of two arms. In this paper, we focus on the phase sensitivity directed against the latter scenario. The optimal single-mode input is discussed by analyzing common states, including displaced squeezed states, displaced number states, squeezed number states, Schrodinger cat states and completely mixed states. We find that the best choice is a squeezed vacuum state and show the specific measurement scheme which is capable of saturating the corresponding phase sensitivity limit. In addition, we study the effects of several realistic factors-anti-squeezing noise, photon loss and dark counts-on the phase sensitivity. Our results suggest that sub-shot-noise-limited phase sensitivity is attainable with low noise or loss, which paves the way for practical metrology. (C) 2022 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available