4.6 Article

Pixel-wise structured light calibration method with a color calibration target

Journal

OPTICS EXPRESS
Volume 30, Issue 20, Pages 35817-35827

Publisher

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OE.463423

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
  2. [2019-R2-CX-0069]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes the use of a calibration target with a narrow spectral color range for the background and a broader spectral color range for the feature points, along with fringe patterns matching the background color for accurate phase extraction. By eliminating the computational framework estimate smooth phase near high-contrast feature edges, this method significantly simplifies and improves the algorithm.
We propose to use a calibration target with a narrow spectral color range for the background (e.g., from blue) and broader spectral color range for the feature points (e.g., blue + red circles), and fringe patterns matching the background color for accurate phase extraction. Since the captured fringe patterns are not affected by the high contrast of the calibration target, phase information can be accurately extracted without edging artifacts. Those feature points can be clearly seen by the camera if the ambient light matches the feature color or without the background color. We extract each calibration pose for three-dimensional coordinate determination for each pixel, and then establish pixel-wise relationship between each coordinate and phase. Comparing with our previously published method, this method significantly fundamentally simplifies and improves the algorithm by eliminating the computational framework estimate smooth phase near high-contrast feature edges. Experimental results demonstrated the success of our proposed calibration method. (C) 2022 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available