4.6 Article

High parametric efficiency in laser cavity-soliton microcombs

Journal

OPTICS EXPRESS
Volume 30, Issue 22, Pages 39816-39825

Publisher

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OE.470376

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/S001018/1]
  2. European Research Council [725046, 851758]
  3. Defence Science and Technology Laboratory [DSTLX1000142078]
  4. Innovate UK [10004412, 77087]
  5. Leverhulme Trust [ECF-2020-537]
  6. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  7. Ministere de l'Economie, de la Science et de l'Innovation-Quebec
  8. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB24030300]
  9. European Research Council (ERC) [851758, 725046] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study theoretically and experimentally investigates the soliton conversion efficiency between the narrowband input pulse and the two outputs of a four-port integrated microcavity. It is found that the single-soliton conversion efficiencies of the broadband comb outputs are high, with a total conversion efficiency of 72% in a specific micro-ring resonator case.
Laser cavity-soliton microcombs are robust optical pulsed sources, usually im-plemented with a microresonator-filtered fibre laser. In such a configuration, a nonlinear microcavity converts the narrowband pulse resulting from bandwidth-limited amplification to a background-free broadband microcomb. Here, we theoretically and experimentally study the soliton conversion efficiency between the narrowband input pulse and the two outputs of a four-port integrated microcavity, namely the 'Drop' and 'Through' ports. We simultaneously measure on-chip, single-soliton conversion efficiencies of 45% and 25% for the two broadband comb outputs at the 'Drop' and 'Through' ports of a 48.9 GHz free-spectral range micro-ring resonator, obtaining a total conversion efficiency of 72%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available