4.7 Article

Geometric defects identification and deviation compensation in laser deposition manufacturing

Journal

OPTICS AND LASER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 155, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.108374

Keywords

Laser deposition manufacturing; Geometric defects; Point cloud; Forming accuracy

Funding

  1. National natural science foundation of China [51975387]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a defect identification and compensation method for laser deposition manufacturing (LDM) is proposed. By utilizing a high-speed laser profiler to collect surface point cloud data and applying various processing techniques, the geometric defects of the LDM part can be successfully detected and controlled, resulting in improved part quality.
Geometric defect can result in a failed part and is costly in terms of time and material. Detecting and control defect is essential for a part by additive manufacturing to avoid further deterioration of the part accuracy. In this paper, a defect identification and compensation method for laser deposition manufacturing(LDM) is proposed to enhance the part quality. This work investigated the use of high-speed laser profiler to collect the surface point cloud concerning a part under building, and then these data were utilized to detect the defect region according to the given deviation threshold. Statistic filter, least-square method and projection approach were employed for deviation point cloud denoising, segmentation and contour extraction. An algorithm was presented to distinguish regions which needed compensation and generated corresponding scan path based on in-situ point cloud processing. The experimental results showed that the setup successful detected the geometric defects of the LDM part and controlled the machine motion system to deposit the deviation region, and the resulting part was more geometrically identical to the expected 3D representation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available