4.6 Article

Spectroscopic ellipsometry characterization of PbWO4 single crystals

Journal

OPTICAL MATERIALS
Volume 131, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.optmat.2022.112680

Keywords

Optical properties; Tungstate; Ellipsometry; PbWO4

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Optical characterization of PbWO4 single crystals grown by the Czochralski method was performed using spectroscopic ellipsometry experiments. The tetragonal scheelite structure and the energy dependence of the complex dielectric function of the crystal were determined. The refractive index, dielectric constant, and optical band gap were calculated, and two critical points in the dielectric function were identified.
Optical characterization of PbWO4 single crystals grown by Czochralski method was achieved in virtue of spectroscopic ellipsometry experiments carried out in the energy region of 1.0-5.6 eV at room temperature. Tetragonal scheelite structure with lattice parameters of a = b = 5.4619 & Aring; and c = 12.0490 & Aring; was determined for the bulk crystal utilizing from XRD analysis. Analyses of the ellipsometry data presented the photon energy dependencies of complex dielectric function of the crystal. The real part of the dielectric function exhibited increasing behavior with energy in the below 4.1 eV and then decreased immediately. Zero frequency refractive index and dielectric constant were determined to be 2.02 and 4.08, respectively, using Wemple and DiDomenico oscillator model. High frequency dielectric constant was calculated as 4.30 by Spitzer-Fan model. Optical band gap of PbWO4 was found to be 3.24 eV from the dielectric relaxation time spectrum. Moreover, existence of two critical points with energies of 3.70 and 4.58 eV was revealed from the analyses of extinction coefficient and second derivative of the dielectric function. These levels were considered to be due to creation of cation exciton (Pb2+ 6s(2) - Pb2+ 6s6p) and transitions in the [WO4](2-) group.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available