4.7 Review

A Systematic Review of Patient Education Strategies for Oncology Patients in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Journal

ONCOLOGIST
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 2-11

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac206

Keywords

cancer education; patient education; education materials; LMICs

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review summarizes the literature on oncology patient education strategies specific to low- and middle-income countries to identify gaps in order to set priorities for future research. Results show limited research and heterogeneity in education approaches and evaluation in these countries. Further research is urgently needed to determine successful patient education and evaluation strategies to improve treatment outcomes.
This review summarizes the literature on oncology patient education strategies specific to low- and middle-income countries to identify gaps in order to set priorities for future research. Introduction Patient education can facilitate early cancer diagnosis, enhance treatment adherence, and improve outcomes. While there is increasing cancer burden in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), there is little research to inform successful patient education in these regions. This systematic review summarizes the existing literature on oncology education and evaluation strategies in LMICs, identifies best practices, and highlights areas which require further investigation. Methods The review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines and an a priori protocol. Four databases (Ovid Medline, Cochrane Libraries, Embase, and Cabi) were searched in December 2021. Two independent reviewers evaluated studies for inclusion. Using a coded data extraction form, information was collected about the study site, intervention characteristics, and evaluation methods. Results Of the 2047 articles generated in the search, 77 met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-four countries were represented; only 6 studies (8%) were in low-income countries. The most common education methods included technology-based interventions (31, 40%) and visual pamphlets or posters (20, 26%). More than one education method was used in 57 (74%) studies. Nurses were the most frequent educators (25, 33%). An evaluation was included in 74 (96%) studies, though only 41 (55%) studies used a validated tool. Patient knowledge was the most common measured outcome in 35 (47%) studies. Conclusions There is limited empiric research on oncology patient education in LMICs. The available data show heterogeneity in education approaches and gaps in evaluation. Further research to determine successful patient education and evaluation strategies is urgently needed to improve treatment cancer outcomes in LMICs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available