4.3 Article

Risk Factors for Legal Blindness in 77 Japanese Patients with Endogenous Endophthalmitis: A Multicenter Cohort Study from J-CREST

Journal

OCULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND INFLAMMATION
Volume 31, Issue 7, Pages 1505-1512

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/09273948.2022.2112237

Keywords

Endogenous endophthalmitis; Endophthalmitis; pressure injuries; retrospective study; vitrectomy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This retrospective observational study investigated potential predictive factors for visual prognosis in Japanese patients with endogenous endophthalmitis. The study found that pressure injuries, severe clinical symptoms, pathogen identification, and poor baseline visual acuity were risk factors for visual impairment at 12 weeks after treatment initiation. Staphylococcus aureus and fungus were associated with a better visual impairment outcome.
Purpose We investigated potential predictive factors for visual prognosis in Japanese patients with endogenous endophthalmitis. Design Retrospective observational multicenter cohort study. Methods We examined the characteristics of 77 Japanese patients with endogenous endophthalmitis and performed statistical analyses of these real-world data. The primary endpoint was the identification of factors associated with visual prognosis. We examined differences between patients in the better vision and legal blindness groups at 12 weeks after treatment initiation. Results The five risk factors for visual impairment at 12 weeks after treatment initiation were presence of pressure injuries, severe clinical symptoms (presence of eye pain and ciliary injection), pathogen identification, and poor best-corrected visual acuity at baseline. Staphylococcus aureus and fungus were associated with a better visual impairment outcome. Conclusions Endogenous endophthalmitis remains a severe ocular infection; however, it can be managed with rapid treatments, as well as other advances in medical knowledge and technology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available